
Is it too hot at home? This test proves that a simple well -placed fan can really make the difference
Dyson cool CF1
Launch price 275 €
Operation of the price board
Disable your advertising blocker to access all links above.
In recent days, temperatures have increased significantly and many are looking to preserve a little freshness inside their accommodation. As new heat waves planned for the summer, everyone adopts their own methods – with more or less success – to refresh their interior. Some opt to keep closed shutters and windows, others suspend damp linen, while some rely on more technical solutions such as air conditioning.
By exploring YouTube looking for advice to better support the heat, Guillaume, from the computer service, discovered a video that caught his attention. An engineer presents an ingenious method to create an air current in an apartment without crossing ventilation, based on the principle of Bernoulli – all using a simple fan.
Basic notions in physics
Bernoulli’s theorem, as defined on Wikipedia, states that “within a homogeneous and incompressible fluid, subject only to pressure and gravity, an acceleration is always associated with a drop in pressure”. Concretely, this means that if you expel air through a window (window A), a low pressure area is created, which automatically leads to the suction of an equivalent volume of fresh air by another opening (window B). This phenomenon gives rise to an air flow, even without natural circulation, and thus allows better ventilation in closed rooms.
Shark Flexbreeze
Launch price 199 €
Disable your advertising blocker to access all links above.
This process is particularly useful in low -ventilated accommodation. However, during hot weather, its efficiency depends on the external conditions: it only works if the air outside is cooler than that inside. This is frequently the case in the housing facing south, whose walls, exposed to the sun all day, store heat and restore it after sunset. When the external temperatures are very high, the most effective method still remains to maintain windows and closed shutters to limit heat intake.
The opportunity to test this method identified on YouTube was too interesting not to be seized. We have therefore drawn up an verification procedure that is both quick to implement and rigorous in its approach.
The device simply requires two openings overlooking the outside – whether windows located in the same room or separated by a partition, regardless of their size or opening angle – as well as a fan, a tape and an anemometer to measure the air flow.
The installation is very simple: just open the two windows, position the fan facing one (by directing it outward) and installing the anemometer facing the other, so as to capture the incoming air movement.
The fan facing the first window
The anemometer facing the second window
Optimize the distance
From the first minutes of the experience, the results are felt: placed directly at the foot of the window, the fan has almost no measurable effect. The anemometer remains almost motionless, indicating an air flow too weak to cause the slightest rotation of its blades.
By moving the fan of 50 cm away while keeping its alignment with the window, the device finally records a slight air circulation, with an average speed of 0.550 m/s. At 1 meter, the flow gains in intensity, reaching 0.700 m/s on average, with punctual peaks at 0.920 m/s. The best performance is obtained at 1.50 m, where the average flow rate climbs to 0.850 m/s, with a point at 1.25 m/s.
Fan positioned by one meter, well aligned with the window.
The tests carried out at different distances made it possible to confirm that the optimal positioning is between 1 and 1.50 m from the window. Beyond that, in particular at 2 meters, the flow remains present (up to 0.650 m/s at point), but becomes more irregular. This is explained by an increased dispersion of the stirred air: the more distant the fan, the more the flow loses in directionality, and therefore in efficiency to evacuate the air outwards.
It therefore appears essential to find the right compromise between proximity and efficiency: according to our observations, the ideal area is between 1 meter and 1.50 m, where performance is both stable and optimal.
Of course, these results must be put into perspective. They depend on multiple parameters: external conditions, type and position of the windows, characteristics of the fan used, etc. To qualify our conclusions, we carried out the same tests with two different models: a traditional fan with visible blades, and a model without visible blades (Dyson type). In both cases, the Bernoulli effect was well observed, but with notable differences. The classic fan has generated a significantly more powerful air flow than its bladder equivalent, which also confirms laboratory measures previously carried out on this equipment.
Beyond the experimental aspect, this approach above all made it possible to highlight a simple, economical and energy-consuming solution to quickly renew the hot air accumulated in a room after a day of strong heat. A natural method that takes advantage of outdoor air movements, often more pleasant than staying frozen in front of a constant artificial air flow.
Want to save even more? Discover Our promo codes Selected for you.




